EI’s Dan Esposito explains that utility proposals to blend hydrogen with natural gas in their existing distribution network could cost consumers money, increase air pollution and create safety risks while minimally reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

EI research finds that hydrogen is not an effective solution to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from buildings, and blending it with natural gas can increase air pollution, consumer costs, and safety risks.

EI’s Hal Harvey explains that clean energy is now cheaper than polluting sources, and speeding up the clean energy transition will make the U.S. less beholden to petro-state dictators.

EI’s Jeff Rissman explains that a new agreement between the U.S. and the European Union to deliver liquified natural gas contains much ambiguity when it comes to impacts on global greenhouse gas emissions.

EI’s Sarah Spengeman explains that Illinois’s Climate and Equitable Jobs Act is a great example of transformative policymaking because the legislation was crafted through a genuinely inclusive process.

EI’s Mike O’Boyle explains why hydrogen isn’t a silver-bullet solution for carbon-free electricity.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains the immense economic benefits Oregon would realize if it continues taking actions to remain a national climate policy leader.

EI’s Silvio Marcacci explains why increased coal output in 2021 is an outlier rather than a reversal of the fuel’s steep decline.

EI’s Greg Alvarez explains why the Biden Administration’s recent record-setting offshore wind lease auction is a huge deal for the future of a much-needed clean energy source.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains support for wind, solar and electric cars would cut U.S. oil demand enough to offset Russian imports.

EI analysis finds tax credits proposed in the Build Back Better Act would reduce oil demand enough to replace half of Russian imports by 2025, and entirely eclipse Russian oil imports by 2027.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains the only way to protect U.S. consumers from future fossil fuel volatility is to reduce demand, not increase the supply of domestic oil.

EI analysis finds the Build Back Better Act’s electric vehicle provisions could cut U.S. oil consumption by 180 million barrels per year by 2030, more than double what the nation imported from Russia last year.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains the best way to bridge the shortfall resulting from the ban on Russian oil is to decrease demand, not increase supply.

EI’s Greg Alvarez explains why the clean energy tax credits in the Build Back Better Act have the potential to be transformative policies.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains the only robust, long-term way to be energy secure is to eliminate demand for fossil fuels.

EI’s Robbie Orvis explains the Build Back Better Act’s incentives for zero-emission vehicles and provisions to reduce natural gas usage would help mitigate reliance on Russian oil and gas imports.

EI’s Silvio Marcacci explains the clean energy provisions in the Build Back Better Act would reduce U.S. oil and gas demand enough to offset Russian imports while protecting consumers from future price spikes.

EI’s Silvio Marcacci explains that electrification efforts currently under consideration in Congress could more than offset U.S. imports of Russian oil.

EI’s Mike O’Boyle explains why climate action can be a powerful tool to help fight inflation while saving money for American families and businesses.